|
gremline.com |
|
the online flight safety digest |
|
The Gremline Forum & Letters to the Editor Correspondence should be sent to postmaster@gremline.com. The views expressed on this page are those of the correspondents only. All correspondence will be reviewed by the editors prior to publication. Time and space preclude publication of all correspondence, but we will do our utmost to publish items in the public interest and representative selections of correspondence where there is ongoing debate. The editors reserve the right to edit, condense or precis submitted material.
Our Apologies In March 2008 our Pilot Shop affiliate ‘Flight Store’ cancelled its Affiliate Programme without prior notification (or any notification at all). For this reason our Pilot Shop pages were scrambled for a time while we rebuilt our site. Our Pilot Shop has been discontinued for the time being, but our Bookshop is still live. We hope to provide an alternative Pilot Shop in the future.
Important News Release: April 2008
Extension of London Area Lower Airspace Radar Service (LARS) The London Area LARS was introduced in September 2007. The service is being extended from April 2008 to cover the area north of London.
1 April: all three sectors will operate from 08.00-20.00 local time, seven days a week except for Christmas and Boxing Days when all three will be closed. Please note that although LARS will help you fly safely through London’s busy airspace you will still remain responsible for terrain clearance and separation from other traffic.
For a full description of the new service see the UK AIP section ENR 1-6-3 at www.ais.org.uk.
Gremline News Gremline was relaunched in 2007 as a free resource. Articles will be added to this site at approximately monthly intervals. We welcome your views on this site and any comments or news that you might wish to see published (subject to our general Conditions). To register for e-mail updates mail us at postmaster@gremline.com. When first registering, it is worth checking that your e-mail client is not mistakenly identifying Gremline mails as spam. Updates are mailed to opt-ins and link-partners at the end of each month or the beginning of the month following. Please check your spam filter or Bulk folder and ensure that Gremline mails are whitelisted or marked as Not Spam. Please note that our regular mailings never contain attachments. If you receive mail purporting to come from Gremline and showing an attachment, delete immediately. Please help keep Gremline free by supporting our Shops, Affiliates and Advertisers.
To the Editors
From the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (Australia) Guys I have just seen the Gremline web site for the
first time. I had two opposing reactions that I'd like to share. I am
webmaster for the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australia. I don't have an
aviation background but I've been doing this job for the last 10 years. The second reaction was: the information was
very good. I'm not a pilot but the article on Accidents on Landing was
excellent. Very knowledgeable and well written. It’s good to hear from Down Under (excuse our Northern Hemisphere chauvinism!) Sorry that you object to the blue text — this is the first complaint we have had on this score, and most of the people we have contacted over a couple of incarnations of Gremline seem to like it. Your comments on our material are appreciated. Our intention from the outset was to produce useful information simply and without gimmicks. Our prehistoric software is perfectly adequate for this purpose and avoids the financial/time commitment involved in introducing more sophisticated technology. As specialist journalists we are much more concerned with flight safety than with keeping up with the internet Joneses.
From SATCO Exeter Our article Orbits in the Visual Circuit, based on an incident at Exeter International Airport UK (posted December 2007) was forwarded to the Senior Air Traffic Control Officer, Exeter, for comment. We have received a constructive response, which is published in full in the body of the article. This article, and the previously posted To Extend Downwind or Not to Extend? seems to have generated some discussion in GA and ATC circles. We welcome further contributions to the debate.
From the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety Congratulations. I have just come across your site and thank you for the link to our work. I think it’s very important to have a good supply of reliable information to assist the General Aviation community. Well done. Keep me posted on developments. Best wishes Robert Gifford Executive Director
From the Editor of ‘Flight Safety’, the Bulletin of the General Aviation Safety Council (UK) Dear John, Ed Paintin
From Martyn Pegg, Vehicle & Operators Safety Agency (UK) Just reading through your note on aquaplaning and noticed you refer to ABS as Automatic Brake System. It is in fact Antilock Brake System. Hope this helps and thanks for the good site. Thank you for your message about 'ABS' and for your kind comments about our web site. It's nice to know that someone is paying attention! I agree with your comment that ABS in road vehicles means 'Antilock Brake System' -- the design being developed from the original 'Maxaret' system introduced by Dunlop in the 1950s and fitted to some early British jet aircraft. However, most modern airliners have some sort of Automatic Braking System that may be selected by the pilot before landing or before beginning the takeoff run. So, 'ABS' can refer to either 'Antilock Brake System' or 'Automatic Brake System'. We are both right, but our aquaplaning article was written in the context of aircraft systems.
From Brett Jones, USA From the EditorA Passing Thought …. On Life Jackets
|
|
the gremline forum — news & views |